on the cheap and sleazy side (www.cheapandsleazy.net)
Mark Kislingbury Says ...
Mark Explains His Speed Building Methodology
Recently on the Yahoo group CourtReportingStudents, Florida CR student (and blogger) Katiana asked a question:
Subject: Mark Kislinbgury
"What does this champion speed writer say about reading back? What does he say about practicing for 'control?' I don't think advocates practicing for control at all."
I checked the interview with Mark on StenoLife, but neither subject came up ... so I sent him (Mark) an e-mail.
He sent back a detailed response, which I am sharing with those of you who haven't already seen it on the CourtReportingStudents group (and even those that have).
... I do have time at the moment to answer this student question from the Yahoo group:
"What does this champion speed writer say about reading back? What does he say about practicing for 'control?' I don't think (he) advocates practicing for control at all."
Here is my answer:
On reading back: I believe everyone should practice reading back, so that you can be good at reading back. Once you are good at reading back, you can do far less of it. But always do some so that you will not lose the ability to read back at a good pace. Personally, I don't find reading back to be something that helps me in speed building. To me it's a waste of time. Because court reporters must be able to read back, we must practice so that we are able to read back. But not for gaining writing speed.
On practicing for control: Here is a description of my speed building method, which does not include practicing for control, and I will explain why further down.
Every student and reporter should be able to write nearly perfectly at SOME speed.
That "nearly perfectly" level, let's call that your Realtime Speed.
There is also a speed level at which every student and reporter can, on average, transcribe that speed and usually get a score of 95% or better.
Let's call that your Top Speed.
I have found that by practicing hard at speeds 25-30% above my Top Speed, I most quickly improve. I have heard many stories of court reporters who show up at a job, it's way too fast, but by the end of the day the court reporter has adapted and gained the necessary speed. And that's in one day. And it was done by being forced to write considerably faster than the reporter's Top Speed.
When you practice 25-30% above your Top Speed, your Top Speed goes up, automatically. And your Realtime Speed automatically goes up as well. By itself. It rises at the same rate the Top Speed rises, all by practicing at high speeds. You can prove it be testing yourself at, say, 10% above your old Top Speed, and 10% above your old Realtime Speed, and you will see that you are now better. So, no need to practice for "control," as you have already improved merely by high-speed practice.
Let me give an example.
Harold is a student who has passed two Q&A tests at 200 wpm. Let us call that his Top Speed. Or at least, he is almost at 200, since he has only passed two tests at that speed and failed a number of others.
When Harold writes Q&A at 160 wpm (or so), it's nearly perfect. So that's his Realtime Speed.
Harold Top Speed: 200 wpm
Harold Realtime Speed: 160 wpm
Now, at this point, if Harold wants to write for "control," he can just go to 160 wpm, and he has great control there. If he goes to 200 wpm, he's barely hanging on, not much control there, but he has passed two tests. It's not beautiful by any means, but he can pass 200 wpm on occasion.
Schools traditionally would tell Harold to keep practicing at 200, and sometimes 210, until he slowly slowly improves.
To the contrary, I teach that Harold should now be practicing at 25-30% faster than his Top Speed, which means, he should practice Q&A at 250-260 wpm.
My method involves the following:
We are trying to teach him to move his fingers faster, at all costs, even at the cost of accuracy.
(Note: if he needs to drop Q. or A. symbols to keep up, go ahead, do it -- it's better to do that than to drop words)
He needs to give himself credit for a job well done whenever he doesn't drop, and whenever the strokes "feel" close to what they should be. (It is important to note that he will not be able to read what he is writing at 250-260, but as long as he follows the above, he will improve, and fast.)
After practicing this way for as long as he can, as often as he can, Harold then should come back down to 200 wpm to TEST himself. He should write at 200 wpm for ONLY 30 SECONDS, still following #1, #2, #3, and #4 above. He should be able to read it back (or transcribe it) PERFECTLY.
Harold does so, and he's amazed that he can write at 200 wpm, for 30 seconds, perfectly!
Harold should NOT keep writing at 200, but go right back to 250-260 and keep practicing there. If he wants to come back down to 200, or 225, he can, but only for 30 seconds, to demonstrate that he can read it back (or transcribe it) perfectly.
Using this method, he will master 200. Next comes 225. Now he should practice 280-290 wpm, using the same methods.
Very soon, Harold will pass his 225s and be out of school.
Now, there is no "practicing for control" in this method, as when Harold went back down to 200, and 225, he found he was very good already, and so no need for "control" practice as it's already there. Practicing hard at high speeds automatically gives control at low speeds -- providing that the methods of #1, #2, #3, and #4 above are adhered to.
Many students (as well as reporters) have used my methods and quickly advanced as a result.
If you are a student or reporter using a STROKE-INTENSIVE THEORY, you MUST also shorten your writing by incorporating hundreds, and then thousands, of briefs for common words and phrases. If you don't, your Top Speed, even using my methods, will be LIMITED to (depending on your talent level) 225-240, and 260 for the most talented.
However, if you shorten your writing a great deal, and combine this with high-speed practice, speeds of 300, 340, and 360 are possible! And even higher.